Site logo
Science of Involution

Involution

Introduction
The need for new explanatory models
The philosophical basics
Origin of life and cosmos from the involutionary perspective
Definitions
Further sources


Introduction

One of the most fundamental and most important questions of science and research in general is: How did life begin on earth? Particularly, what is the origin of mankind?

Today’s pre-dominant explanatory model is based on Charles Darwin’s hypothesis set forth in his books the
Origin of Species and The Descent of Man in the second half of the 19th century. This hypothesis postulates that higher life forms developed from lower and that the first unicellular organisms evolved from organic matter accidentally by a so-called “biogenesis.” Darwinism arises from a materialistic worldview. Its basic assumptions are: “life originated from matter,” and “everything that exists—also life and consciousness—is a function of material energy and can be explained by the laws of matter.”

Historically, Darwinism was a reaction to the biblical fundamentalist orthodoxy of the church which had been imposed by patronizing and totalitarian measures of violence over centuries. In the 19th century enlightenment and emancipation movements were developed on such a broad scale that it was even possible to voice opinions that were not in line with Church doctrines without risking one’s life. But, as so often, the pendulum was swinging from one extreme to the other: from fundamental creationism to material Darwinism. Anything that could not be explained scientifically (in other words, rationally) was suddenly considered irrational and hence unreal. This has been true for any form of creationism.

Fundamental creationism as some interpret the Bible, and others the Koran, holds that God created the world and mankind seven thousand years ago. According to this concept of belief, paradise came to an end by the fall of man (the original sin), and that it is why man needs the kind of salvation that is proclaimed by the advocates of this religious doctrine. Thus, creationism is associated with a dogmatic doctrine of salvation in an absolute manner, and any other biblical interpretations, and especially all other religions, are considered to be designed by the devil, the same evil power that provoked the fall of man in paradise.

Nowadays the most vehement—and best—criticism of the concept of evolution is expressed by creationists. This controversy is so categorical and based on a black and white dichotomy that many, even intellectuals, think creationism is the only alternative to Darwinism. Since they reject creationism with its underlying dogmatic principles, they profess—mostly without any further questions—the “scientifically” confirmed faith of Darwinism.

back


The need for new explanatory models

The theory of involution is an explanatory model that takes a critical approach to creationism and Darwinism—on the one hand, in order to realize and overcome the ideological one-sidedness of these two antagonistic extremes, and on the other hand, to learn from both sides and to build on their research findings.

The
theory of evolution is not proven at all, it is not even scientific, because there is no theoretical model that would show how unicellular organisms become mulitcellular organisms, fish become amphibians, amphibians become reptiles and reptiles become birds and finally mammals. If this evolutionary development had taken place—allegedly via accumulation of many minor beneficial genetic mutations—there would be transitional forms that would be 95 % reptile and 5 % mammal for example, then 90 % reptile and 10 % mammal and so on. But there are no such forms to be found in the totality of fossils and they would not have been viable. This is just one of many arguments against the materialistic theory of evolution.

However,
creationism is not proven either. First of all, the assumption that God created the world seven thousand years ago is only one of many possible interpretations of the biblical genesis, and not even the most plausible. There are various distinct contradictions between the Genesis account of the seven day creation and the Adam and Eve story that can be straightened out by the creationists only with great difficulty. The dogmatic doctrine of salvation that is derived from this (constructed) creation scenario leads to irreconcilable claims to absoluteness based on which all other denominations and religions would have to be demonized. These “fruits” demonstrate that there is a separating spirit working behind the fundamentalist form of belief rather than a spirit of a universal God.

The controversy between Darwinists and creationists goes on and becomes even worse. However, open-minded researchers should take both sides seriously instead of standing still, and look for new theories based on their insights that are neither materialistic nor religious-fundamentalist, i. e. theories that go beyond Darwinism and creationism.

The explanatory model of
involution offers a more advanced theory of that kind.

back

The philosophical basics

The explanatory model of involution indicates that “lower” forms do not generate “higher” ones, but instead that “higher” forms generate “lower” forms. According to the theory of evolution, in the beginning there was only matter—from matter everything came into existence, even “life”, starting from the first primitive organisms from which the higher, more complex, forms of life are said to have gradually developed. The theory assumes that apes descended from primates who developed consciousness and self-perception as soon as their brain had grown large enough. Thus, based on the theory of evolution, “animal” became “human.”

In the evolution theory consciousness is considered a product of the brain, similar to wood that suddenly—when the spark occurs—generates light (thoughts) and heat (emotions) through the energy of the fire (consciousness). So here we deal with a worldview in which matter is regarded as the absolute reality. Materialism—as much as the supporters of that concept emphasize its “objective” and “scientific” approach—is also merely a system of belief that postulates something absolute, i. e. the matter (as “energy” of non-duality). The explanatory model of involution indicates that consciousness—rather than matter—is the origin of everything. In philosophical terms: the absolute background of all relativity and duality is not an abstract “non-duality” of energy (matter), but “in-dividuality“, literally: the “in-divisible” (eternal, spiritual) existence that is always a conscious existence (consciousness). For everything that exists also exists—directly or indirectly—as the origin (source) of everything. Since there is consciousness in creation, it must have originated from the source and hence also exist “there.” In both, the relative (in creation with all its creatures) and the absolute (God in “his” immanent and transcendent presence), the unique characteristic is individuality (“indivisible, eternal consciousness”).

back

Origin of life and cosmos from the involutionary perspective

Every worldview has to be based on the assumption of an original and absolute source. According to Darwinism, its source is matter in its abstract “original” form as energy. In creationism, its source is a creator who is only revealed by one individual denominationally defined doctrine.

From the involutionary perspective, the source is the “all-including consciousness” which encompasses all that is relative. All “relative” (all that has been created) is “consciousness” after all, i. e. individual Being, since the “absolute” (God)—in a literal meaning—is also individual: “indivisible and undivided.” Hence, God as absolute individuality is both transcendent and immanently omnipresent, and is not divided into past and future. So consciousness in its essence is not subject to space and time. This holds valid for God’s consciousness as well as for our own consciousness!

And this is how “Creation” occurs:

Original matter and cosmos emerge from the absolute, eternal background of God’s and all spiritual beings’ individuality (in cycles), through an “interdimensional evolution” (involution) from the higher, less dense levels of matter down to the dimension where matter is most dense. While the everlasting is always present in the background (immanently and transcendentally), time and space (universe) come into existence through a divine creation and therein firstly the highest, less dense dimensional world. This highest plane, “heaven,” includes all other parallel worlds which then—as time passes by, or rather, in the course of space and time—will evolve from one another through “involution.”  Most mystery traditions distinguish seven levels of dimension.
 
The explanatory model of involution is based on the assumption of absoluteness of individuality (not absoluteness of matter) and accepts that the cosmos is multidimensional: consciousness and life as original principle are absolute and eternal realities. The different levels of life (dimensions) and creatures come into existence as a “reflection” based on the characteristic “models” of the next higher dimensions, i. e. the “original image” of the absolute consciousness.

In simpler terms: “God created man in His own image.”

back


Definitions

The evolutionary theory indicates that higher forms evolve from the lower, matter being the original source. According to the involutionary model the lower are generated from the higher, consciousness being the source.

Hence, involution can be defined as “interdimensional, cosmically descending evolution, controlled and executed through mental impulses which inspire and form matter; a cosmic-hierarchical creation from the highest, least dense dimensional world to the world of three-dimensional dense planets and bodies. Involution means that spirit precedes matter and that creation occurs when spiritual beings go into matter (for any reason whatsoever) and form entire worlds, as well as fate and destiny, through their respective orientation of consciousness.


This explanatory model defines matter as an eternal energy which develops transient material forms (“bodies,” as in bodies of light and celestial bodies as well as terrestrial animal and plant bodies), and all that under the shaping and inspiring influence of the spiritual source, the eternal, individual consciousness (in an interplay between the consciousness of God and that of the spiritual beings).
  Thus, consciousness is not the product of a brain that is “large enough.” Consciousness is a reality of its own, independent from matter, just like light is a reality of its own, independent from shadows. If matter and energy were the absolute reality, there would be no free will—a concept of belief also in materialism, in both secular and occult circles. Materialistic worldviews are always atheistic and godless.

The explanatory model of involution depicts the cosmos from a theistic point of view which is not synonymous with a monotheistic point of view. “Theism” refers to a revelation and an insight which conceives God as an absolute, all-encompassing individuality. “Monotheism” refers to denominations that absolutize one relative form of God and declare this to be the only truth. The latter concept gives rise to all forms of fundamentalist creationism.

back

Further sources

In its basics, the explanatory model of involution corresponds to the mythological views of the world in all ancient cultures, all revelations and also the mystical visions of many seers, prophets, shamans and brahmins. It explains the phenomena of “life” and “consciousness” as well as the origin of humanity in a plausible way, and is also supported by the theories of modern parapsychology, metaphysics and quantum physics.

A basic summary of these concepts can be found in the works of Armin Risi, in particular his trilogy
Der multidimensionale Kosmos,” his bookDas kosmische Erbe” and in “Licht wirft keinen Schatten,” as well as in English in the third part of his book “TranscEnding the Global Power Game—The Cosmic Background of Past and Present History;” all with detailed references.

Translated by Stephanie Stockklauser, Berlin

back